05.10.2022, 18:21
(Dieser Beitrag wurde zuletzt bearbeitet: 07.02.2023, 17:09 von riffclown.
Bearbeitungsgrund: clarification
)
I agree some actions would be warranted. Without pointing fingers, perhaps not publishing ratings until after 15 and dropping the top 2 and bottom 2 ratings from the calculations would be a prudent approach. IT wouldn't totally eliminate the issue but it would prevent one individual from successfully making the whole community look bad. The downside is it would mean more puzzles may never see a rating.
Like MANY others in the puzzling community, when I see a solve by this individual I automatically add 2-5 points to puzzle rating in my head. I for one love it when someone deems one of my puzzles good enough to feature and I gladly consent to my puzzles being used as video showcases.
The flip side of this conversation is many setters were leaning towards more and more complex puzzles just to avoid solves by this individual. That's also not fair to the community at large.
Like MANY others in the puzzling community, when I see a solve by this individual I automatically add 2-5 points to puzzle rating in my head. I for one love it when someone deems one of my puzzles good enough to feature and I gladly consent to my puzzles being used as video showcases.
The flip side of this conversation is many setters were leaning towards more and more complex puzzles just to avoid solves by this individual. That's also not fair to the community at large.