12.09.2011, 09:54
Hi Robert,
OK. I got that point. I'll think about it. (Originally my hope was, that people get tiered of the No. 1s and start to vote for other types.)
There are more risks. It might even be the case, that people can solve the puzzle twice, with the second score counting. This would definitively lead to an unfair result. I think, I need to keep the right to remove some days from the rating if I have some reason to do so. E.g. if a puzzle creeps in, that has several solutions, which happend in summer 2009.
(12.09.2011, 09:08)RobertBe schrieb: It is simply that I am getting increasingly frustrated with the Liga System that seems to favor puzzles that are very easy to solve over puzzles that require some thought. No-fun puzzles like Heyawake or Hashi are impossible to keep in the 2nd League. And even though I like Doppelstern, I am getting very tired of having to solve one so much. Month after month it ends on the first place. And to a lesser degree, this is also the case for Tapa.
OK. I got that point. I'll think about it. (Originally my hope was, that people get tiered of the No. 1s and start to vote for other types.)
Zitat:And there even is a point to be made for keeping the scores intact. People knew beforehand the server would be down some time and can then decide for themselves if they want to take the risk or not.
There are more risks. It might even be the case, that people can solve the puzzle twice, with the second score counting. This would definitively lead to an unfair result. I think, I need to keep the right to remove some days from the rating if I have some reason to do so. E.g. if a puzzle creeps in, that has several solutions, which happend in summer 2009.