+- Logic Masters Forum (https://forum.logic-masters.de)
+-- Forum: Rätselmeisterschaften und Rätselwettbewerbe (https://forum.logic-masters.de/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: WSPC 2019 (https://forum.logic-masters.de/forumdisplay.php?fid=42)
+--- Thema: WPC: Round 3 Individual - Permaculture (/showthread.php?tid=1754)
WPC: Round 3 Individual - Permaculture - uvo - 20.09.2019
Any questions about WPC Round 3 should be asked here.
RE: WPC: Round 3 Individual - Permaculture - qiuyanzhe - 25.09.2019
3.7 Anglers+Battleships
Must the outside clue belong to the same puzzle as the first cell in its direction?
RE: WPC: Round 3 Individual - Permaculture - uvo - 25.09.2019
(25.09.2019, 08:27)qiuyanzhe schrieb: 3.7 Anglers+Battleships
Must the outside clue belong to the same puzzle as the first cell in its direction?
Generally, no. But if a number belongs to the Anglers part, the line starting in that number must enter the grid in the first cell, which must belong to the Anglers part then.
If it weren't too late (the instruction booklets are already being printed), I would change the example by moving the 2 in the second column from the top to the bottom.
RE: WPC: Round 3 Individual - Permaculture - NikolaZ - 25.09.2019
One of the rules says: "It is possible that one part completely surrounds the other." . According to this, in 3.5 puzzle Dominoes + Slitherlink can the loop surround domino cells if they are placed along the edge of the grid?
RE: WPC: Round 3 Individual - Permaculture - uvo - 25.09.2019
(25.09.2019, 22:53)NikolaZ schrieb: One of the rules says: "It is possible that one part completely surrounds the other." . According to this, in 3.5 puzzle Dominoes + Slitherlink can the loop surround domino cells if they are placed along the edge of the grid?
I'm not sure I understand correctly what you had in mind. I think what you describe is not possible, because (quoting from the instructions) the loop cannot use edges that do not border any Slitherlink cell.
RE: WPC: Round 3 Individual - Permaculture - NikolaZ - 25.09.2019
Ah, I missed it.