Questions regarding WSC round 4 - All 81 - Druckversion +- Logic Masters Forum (https://forum.logic-masters.de) +-- Forum: Rätselmeisterschaften und Rätselwettbewerbe (https://forum.logic-masters.de/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: WSPC 2019 (https://forum.logic-masters.de/forumdisplay.php?fid=42) +--- Thema: Questions regarding WSC round 4 - All 81 (/showthread.php?tid=1738) |
Questions regarding WSC round 4 - All 81 - Richard - 15.09.2019 All questions regarding WSC round 4 must be asked here. RE: Questions regarding WSC round 4 - All 81 - rob - 17.09.2019 4.10 Three is a crowd Does a "wrong" clue simply not count, or is the corresponding number not allowed to appear in the next three cells? RE: Questions regarding WSC round 4 - All 81 - Richard - 17.09.2019 (17.09.2019, 18:44)rob schrieb: 4.10 Three is a crowdThe latter. RE: Questions regarding WSC round 4 - All 81 - detuned - 18.09.2019 4.10 Three is a crowd - is it guaranteed that all 36 triplets of clues will be given? RE: Questions regarding WSC round 4 - All 81 - Richard - 18.09.2019 (18.09.2019, 00:36)detuned schrieb: 4.10 Three is a crowd - is it guaranteed that all 36 triplets of clues will be given?Yes. RE: Questions regarding WSC round 4 - All 81 - pwahs - 18.09.2019 A bit of a pedantic question, but last year I didn't ask a pedantic question I thought of, and then people started writing negative numbers in their Sandglass puzzles and got away with it 4.4 Hidden Skyscrapers Sudoku: I assume the rules want to express "All possible arrows are given"? The way it is written know you could take a cell with multiple arrows and leave out some, but not all of them. RE: Questions regarding WSC round 4 - All 81 - Richard - 18.09.2019 (18.09.2019, 16:44)pwahs schrieb: A bit of a pedantic question, but last year I didn't ask a pedantic question I thought of, and then people started writing negative numbers in their Sandglass puzzles and got away with it Yes, that is what is meant here. ... visible in all directions of the arrow(s). Would be a better instruction?
RE: Questions regarding WSC round 4 - All 81 - pwahs - 18.09.2019 (18.09.2019, 16:54)Richard schrieb:No, the problem is more that you are grouping all arrows in a cell in the same single "if and only" statement. I would just slap "All possible arrows are given." on the end to make it water tight.(18.09.2019, 16:44)pwahs schrieb: A bit of a pedantic question, but last year I didn't ask a pedantic question I thought of, and then people started writing negative numbers in their Sandglass puzzles and got away with it RE: Questions regarding WSC round 4 - All 81 - Richard - 18.09.2019 (18.09.2019, 17:18)pwahs schrieb:OK, I'll add that in the next version of the IB. (and competition puzzle of course.)(18.09.2019, 16:54)Richard schrieb:No, the problem is more that you are grouping all arrows in a cell in the same single "if and only" statement. I would just slap "All possible arrows are given." on the end to make it water tight.(18.09.2019, 16:44)pwahs schrieb: A bit of a pedantic question, but last year I didn't ask a pedantic question I thought of, and then people started writing negative numbers in their Sandglass puzzles and got away with it |