Is this acceptable on LMG: appending a solve path documentation with the puzzle

[FKlauser]

To clarify: I do not mean to (re)start the debate on online-solvers, their functions etc. I want to know whether the users of this site prefer it to be, as it were, "competitive" - only those who managed to figure out the logic of the puzzle should have the honor of having their names among the solvers - or "demonstrative" of the logic and interactions the setter has set, even if this means stating that logic outright in a solving guide attached to the puzzle? Or to put it more directly, would you be fundamentally against a puzzle coming with a guide to the solution?