Themabewertung:
  • 0 Bewertung(en) - 0 im Durchschnitt
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
einer bestimmten Person die mir immer 0% gibt
#14
(01.05.2021, 13:33)Hausigel schrieb: Hello Pjotr,
I cannot speak for Person X (or Joe or anyone else), but I am having serious issues with your position, too.

Notwithstanding the part about anonymity, I think your claims regarding the ratings of your puzzles are misguided. You say you want acknowledgement for the puzzles you have designed. But authors are not entitled to good ratings. People are not required to like your puzzles. There is - to my knowledge - no definition, what the "Rating" is supposed to stand for; I guess people vote simply whether they "like" the puzzle or not. That is their prerogative.

The rating system has actually been vastly in favor of the authors, because people can only vote for/against puzzles they have solved. My guess is, ratings would generally be lower otherwise. There have been discussions about the avalanche of Sudokus in the Puzzle Portal, and there have been suggestions to force a stop to it, because there is a significant number of solvers who do not like the Portal being flooded by Sudokus. Once again I am only guessing, but I could imagine these people would downvote your sudokus - and those of others - much further.

The rating system has a lot of potential for abouse, and I suppose that is why it has been designed this way, namely so that one must solve a puzzle in the Portal first before one can submit a vote. But on what grounds would you demand that people who have actually solved your puzzles vote that they like them, even if they don't? Your assumption that the energy you invest in a puzzle entitles you to a favorable rating is simply wrong.

I repeat: People are allowed to have different opinions about what puzzles they like. I have given puzzles good or bad ratings based on my personal view what good puzzles should look like. I stand by it, and I expect that other people evaluate my own puzzles accordingly as well. The simplest explanation for such ratings is that the solvers in question have a different taste. (To be honest, I would now downvote some of my older puzzles as well.) Frankly, I find it disturbing that you make such a fuss over it.

Best regards,
Hausigel

First: I did change my posts accordingly this morning, so that the user is anonymous in this thread. I'm sorry for not respecting the privacy of the specific person. For my defence (for what it's worth it), I was pissed of (still am, but already cooled down by a lot) and this was a burst from my side, which I shouldn't have done and which I'm sorry for. That doesn't mean I changed my opinion on the whole matter.

Second: I'm not saying that I'm perfect and I only want perfect scores.
When you publish something, you always want recognition in your work, but that doesn't mean you always get it. 
I am fully aware of the possibility of not getting the recognition or getting negative feedback, I might not like it, but I respect it. 
And also as you state I also want people to be honest when they evaluate my work. 
What I do not respect is a person who is behaving like troll by giving all Sudoku's a bad rating. 
There is a filter on the search engine where you can search for non Sudoku puzzles.

Third: The rating system has indeed a lot of potential for abuse, that's why I am proposing something completely normal, but no one has a good argument against it, except that it benefits me and by this time I already figured I didn't get the likability award on this forum, so that's why according to you it is a bad idea.
That's why I say, put emotions aside and think about the idea itself. It is used widely in judge sports/competitions, statisticians use it all the time and call these anomalies.
Zitieren


Nachrichten in diesem Thema
RE: einer bestimmten Person die mir immer 0% gibt - von PjotrV - 01.05.2021, 14:22

Möglicherweise verwandte Themen...
Thema Verfasser Antworten Ansichten Letzter Beitrag
  Neulich auf einer Geburtstagsfeier... SilBer 5 10.094 08.05.2013, 21:23
Letzter Beitrag: adam001

Gehe zu:


Benutzer, die gerade dieses Thema anschauen: 3 Gast/Gäste