Suchergebnisse
|
Beitrag |
Verfasser |
Forum |
Antworten |
Ansichten |
Geschrieben
[auf]
|
|
|
Thema: Puzzle Up 2020
Beitrag: RE: Puzzle Up 2020
Natürlich habe ich Recht :) Danke für deine Unterstützung. |
|
dm_litv |
Rätseldiskussionen
|
7 |
5.056 |
30.10.2020, 18:03 |
|
|
Thema: Noch mehr Rätsel
Beitrag: RE: Noch mehr Rätsel
Forsmarts - ist nicht Andrey Bogdanov, das ist Vladimir Portugalov (aus Minsk). |
|
dm_litv |
Stammtisch
|
2 |
3.831 |
28.07.2020, 19:18 |
|
|
Thema: PuzzleUp 2019
Beitrag: RE: PuzzleUp 2019
My friend Dmitry Borisenkov, who is also participating in the contest, sent me his 'human' proof of solution.
-----------------------------------------
I do not have a mathematical proof of the alg... |
|
dm_litv |
Rätseldiskussionen
|
47 |
37.479 |
22.12.2019, 17:45 |
|
|
Thema: PuzzleUp 2019
Beitrag: RE: PuzzleUp 2019
(21.12.2019, 00:33)Dandelo schrieb: Did you start with some intelligent heuristics?I.
We assumed that the first 3 weighings are (1..4),(5..8),(9..12)
II.
Then we look at the task as at a two-person... |
|
dm_litv |
Rätseldiskussionen
|
47 |
37.479 |
22.12.2019, 17:38 |
|
|
Thema: PuzzleUp 2019
Beitrag: RE: PuzzleUp 2019
"Twelve Balls":
I have full (computer generated) solution tree for 9 (not 10) weighings.
Unfortunately, it seems impossible to give a human-readable explanation of the solution method. |
|
dm_litv |
Rätseldiskussionen
|
47 |
37.479 |
20.12.2019, 22:35 |
|
|
Thema: PuzzleUp 2019
Beitrag: RE: PuzzleUp 2019
The same in #15 for me - correct answer, 0 points.
The answer '11' for Twelve Balls is absurdly incorrect. |
|
dm_litv |
Rätseldiskussionen
|
47 |
37.479 |
20.12.2019, 13:05 |
|
|
Thema: PuzzleUp 2019
Beitrag: RE: PuzzleUp 2019
"The maximum size of the largest group" - it's trivial;
but
"The _minimum_ size of the largest group" - it doesn't seem trivial to me.
I think we have to wait for the clarification.
The score table i... |
|
dm_litv |
Rätseldiskussionen
|
47 |
37.479 |
16.10.2019, 16:43 |
|
|
Thema: PuzzleUp 2017
Beitrag: RE: PuzzleUp 2017
I think the same.
And the phrase "with a single ball" is just his mistake.
He meant "with one bowl for weighing" (="mit einer Tasse zum Wiegen"). |
|
dm_litv |
Rätseldiskussionen
|
73 |
79.293 |
29.11.2017, 14:04 |
|
|
Thema: PuzzleUp 2017
Beitrag: RE: PuzzleUp 2017
Well, if I correctly interpret the note "PUZZLEUP - October 25, 2017 - 20:47"
then (in my model)
for any object i, should exist object j and time t
when
SystemState(t)={..,a[i]=1,..a[j]=1,..}
Morgens... |
|
dm_litv |
Rätseldiskussionen
|
73 |
79.293 |
25.10.2017, 23:40 |
|
|
Thema: PuzzleUp 2017
Beitrag: RE: PuzzleUp 2017
For me now it looks like this (don't shoot the piano player:))
We have the system with N objects, each of them can be in one of _three_ states:
0 - not fired, 1 - now fired, 2 - burned.
And we have to... |
|
dm_litv |
Rätseldiskussionen
|
73 |
79.293 |
25.10.2017, 22:16 |
|
|
Thema: PuzzleUp 2017
Beitrag: RE: PuzzleUp 2017
@uvo: Sorry, I don't understand how Your relation between i,j (only) can describe all possible ovelaps. |
|
dm_litv |
Rätseldiskussionen
|
73 |
79.293 |
25.10.2017, 21:52 |
|
|
Thema: PuzzleUp 2017
Beitrag: RE: PuzzleUp 2017
#12. Does someone understand this nonsense? I don't :( |
|
dm_litv |
Rätseldiskussionen
|
73 |
79.293 |
25.10.2017, 16:24 |
|
|
Thema: PuzzleUp 2017
Beitrag: RE: PuzzleUp 2017
Yes, I understand the rules exactly just so. |
|
dm_litv |
Rätseldiskussionen
|
73 |
79.293 |
13.09.2017, 19:55 |
|
|
Thema: DSM Qualifikation 2017
Beitrag: RE: DSM Qualifikation 2017
|
dm_litv |
Deutsche Sudoku Meisterschaft und World Sudoku Championships
|
61 |
85.704 |
07.02.2017, 20:14 |
|
|
Thema: PuzzleUp 2016
Beitrag: RE: PuzzleUp 2016
(20.12.2016, 11:24)Senior schrieb: ...(war Nr. 19 die Hürde?).
Yes, indeed. There I wrote such nonsense as the answer.
And most importantly, I had no doubts that I was giving the correct answer. :... |
|
dm_litv |
Rätseldiskussionen
|
38 |
52.415 |
20.12.2016, 17:44 |
|
|
Thema: PuzzleUp 2016
Beitrag: RE: PuzzleUp 2016
Stimmt, aber mit 135 Grad - nur 5, nicht 6. |
|
dm_litv |
Rätseldiskussionen
|
38 |
52.415 |
20.12.2016, 11:07 |
|
|
Thema: PuzzleUp 2016
Beitrag: RE: PuzzleUp 2016
I don't understand :( #10 is the same as #9 from last year, and it was cancelled by unknown reasons, right?
Only the locations of points A,B are different.
PS.
It seems to me I have the reasonable ... |
|
dm_litv |
Rätseldiskussionen
|
38 |
52.415 |
28.09.2016, 14:34 |
|
|
Thema: PuzzleUp 2016
Beitrag: RE: PuzzleUp 2016
I suppose the original puzzle solution (in contrast to the example) will be unique (not counting rotations/reflections). |
|
dm_litv |
Rätseldiskussionen
|
38 |
52.415 |
21.09.2016, 14:52 |
|
|
Thema: PuzzleUp 2016
Beitrag: RE: PuzzleUp 2016
Well, agreed.
15 seconds instead of 45 :) |
|
dm_litv |
Rätseldiskussionen
|
38 |
52.415 |
10.08.2016, 16:59 |
|
|
Thema: PuzzleUp 2016
Beitrag: RE: PuzzleUp 2016
Personally I am in doubt.
Of course your interpretation seems the most natural.
But why can't we assume that the sticks are removed only from the _plane_ of each face? |
|
dm_litv |
Rätseldiskussionen
|
38 |
52.415 |
10.08.2016, 15:15 |